A Review on the Influence of Electrical Process Parameters of Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) on Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate

Authors

  • Bhupender Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana-121006
  • Lokesh Suryavanshi M Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana-121006.
  • Surender Singh Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, YMCAUST, Faridabad, Haryana-121006.

Keywords:

EDM, Process parameters, Material Removal Rate (MRR), Surface Roughness (SR), Polarity.

Abstract

Metal removal processes can be divided into two categories-Conventional machining processes and unconventional machining processes. Conventional processes like drilling, turning, milling, shaping, boring, slotting, etc., take more time for machining of a component than unconventional machining processes. Surface finish too, in conventional machining processes, is not as good as in unconventional processes. In machining of many hard materials and their alloys, conventional machining processes become incapable. So, to avoid all such problems, there are many unconventional machining processes like electrical discharge machining (EDM), electro chemical machining (ECM), laser beam machining (LBM), ultrasonic machining (USM), abrasive jet machining (AJM), water jet machining (WJM), etc. EDM can produce complex shapes and machine hard materials easily. In this review article, consideration is given to the influence of electrical process parameters of EDM on metal removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (SR) like current, voltage, pulse on-time, pulse off-time, duty factor, etc. It was found that surface roughness decreases with decrease in peak current and pulse on-time. MRR increases with increase in pulse on-time, peak current and relative gap voltage. Polarity affects processing speed and finish of EDM operation. MRR is more when tool electrodes are connected at positive terminal than at negative terminal.

References

[1] Muthuramalingam T, Mohan B. A review on influence of electrical process parameters in EDM process. Archives of Civil & Mechanical Engineering 2015; 15: 87-94.
[2] Wikipedia. Internet Search.
[3] Shashikant, Roy AK, Kumar K. Effect and optimization of various machine process parameters on surface roughness in EDM for EN19 material using response surface methodology. Procedia Materials Science 2014; 5: 1702-709.
[4] Muthuramalingam T, Mohan B. Performance analysis of iso current pulse generator on machining characteristics in EDM process. Archives of Civil & Mechanical Engineering 2014; 14: 383- 90.
[5] Sangottuvel P, Kumar S, Dinakaran D. Optimization of multiple characteristics of EDM parameters based on desirability approach and fuzzy modelling. Procedia Engineering 2013; 64: 1069-78.
[6] Shashikant V, Roy AK, Kumar K. Effect and optimization of various machine process parameters on surface roughness in EDM for an EN41 material using Grey- Taguchi. Procedia Materials Science 2014; 6: 383-90.
[7] Habib SS. Study of the parameters in electrical discharge machining through response surface methodology approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2009; 33: 4397-407.
[8] Shashikant V, Roy AK, Kumar K. Effect and optimization of machine process parameters on MRR for EN19 and EN41 materials using Taguchi. Procedia Technology 2014; 14: 204-10.
[9] Juneja BL, Sekhon GS, Seth N. Fundamentals of metal cutting and machine tools. New Age International Publishers 2008; Revised second edition.
[10] Rao GK, Satyanarayana S, Praveen M. Influence of machining parameters on electrical discharge machining of marging steels-An experimental investigation. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008; II. [11] Kandpal BC, Kumar J, Singh H. Machining of aluminium metal matrix composite with electrical discharge machining-A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2015; 2: 1665-71.
[12] Singh H, Singh A. Effect of pulse on/pulse off time on machining of AISI D3 die steel using copper and brass electrode in EDM. International Journal of Engineering & Science 2012; 1(9): 19-22.

Published

2019-01-07