Use of Sisal Fiber as a Stabilizer in Stone Mix Asphalt and as an Additive in Bitumen

Authors

  • Wani Ishfaq Gull
  • Ankit Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Geeta Engineering College, Naultha, Panipat, Haryana, India.

Keywords:

Bituminous Concrete (BC), Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA), Sisal Fiber, Marshall Properties, Static Indirect Tensile Strength, Static Creep

Abstract

The flexible pavements play in important role in the country especially in India. The initial and maintenance cost of these pavements are very less as compared to the rigid or semi-rigid pavements. The main constituent of flexible pavements bitumen which is complex mixture of coarse and fine aggregates and sometimes binders and fillers are also used in it. There are various types of bitumen mixes in which Hot Mix Asphalt is one of them. If HMA is dense graded then it is called Bituminous Concrete (BC) and if it is gap graded then called Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA). In SMA stabilizing additives are used to avoid defunct in the bitumen mixture. The additives used may be polymer, mineral or cellulose fibers etc.
In the present work, an effort has been made to study the special impact of fiber called Sisal, as stabilizer addictive in SMA and in BC. Mixing aggregate gradation is maintained as per MORT and H specification, the percentage of fiber ranges in between 0-0.5 and that of binder ranges between 4-7 of entire mixture. Optimum Binder Content percentage ranges in 5.0-5.21 for BC and SMA respectively and Optimum Fiber Content percentage remains 0.31 for both SMA and BC. Both the mixes are the BC and SMA mixtures are built up at OBC and OFC and are tested to estimate the special impact of adding fiber on mixture performance. And it was found that use of this fiber enhance the properties of the mixture.

How to cite this article:
Gull WI, Ankit. Use of Sisal Fiber as a Stabilizer in Stone Mix Asphalt and as an Additive in Bitumen. Int J Adv Res Civil Stru Engg 2020; 2(2): 22-25.

References

ASTM D. Test Method for Resistance of Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus.

ASTM D. Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength for Bituminous Mixtures.

Brown ER, Manglorkar H. Evaluation of Laboratory Properties of SMA mixtures. NCAT Report No. 93-5, Auburn University, Alabama, 1993.

Brown ER, Mallick RB. Stone Matrix Asphalt Properties Related to Mixture Design. NCAT Report, 1994; 94-02.

Bradley J, Putman, Serji N et al. Utilization of Waste Fibre in Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures. Resources Conservation and Recycling 2004; 42(3): 265-274.

Bose S, Kamaraj C, Nanda PK. Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) A Long Life Pavement Surface. International Seminar on Innovations in Construction and Maintenance of Flexible Pavements, Agra. Technical Papers 2006; 1: 169-17.

Chui-Te C, Li-Cheng Lu. A Laboratory study on Stone Matrix Asphalt using Ground Tire Rubber. Construction and Building Materials 2007; 21(5): 1027-1033.

Bindu CS, Beena KS. Waste Plastic as a Stabilizing additive in SMA. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2010; 2(6): 379-387.

Das A, Chakroborty P. Principles of Transportation Engineering. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi. 2010; 294-299.

Das A, Deol MS, Ohri S et al. Evolution of non-standard bituminous mix a study on Indian specification. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering 2004;

(1): 39-46.

Jony Hass, JahadIsraa Y. The Effect of Using Glass Power filler onHot Asphalt Concrete Mixture Properties. Engg and Technology journal 2010; 29(1): 44-57.

IS: 2386 (1963). Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete (P-I): Particle Size and Shape. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

IS: 2386 (1963). Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete (P-III): Specific Gravity, Density, Voids, Absorption, Bulking. Bureau of Indian Standards, New

Delhi.

IS: 2386 (1963). Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete (P-IV): Mechanical Properties. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

IS: 1203 (1978). Methods for Testing Tar and Bituminous Materials: Determination of Penetration. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

IS: 1205 (1978). Methods for Testing Tar and BituminousMaterials: Determination of Softening Point. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

IRC SP-79 (2008). Specification for SMA.

Ibrahim M. Laboratory Comparison Study for the Use of Stone Matrix Asphalt in Hot Weather Climates. Construction and Building Materials 2005; 20(10):

-989.

Karasahin M, Terzi S. Evaluation of marbal waste dust in mixture of asphalt matrix. Construction and Building Materials 2007; 21(5): 616-620.

Kamraj C, Kumar G, Sharma G et al. Laboratory Studies on the Behaviour of Stone Matrix Asphalt vis-à-vis Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes using Natural Rubbe Powder (Wet Process). Highway Research Bulletin, No 71, IRC, New Delhi. 2004; 39-60.

Khanna SK, Justo CEG Nemchand R et al. Highway Engineering. 2001; 315-321.

Kumar P, Chandra S, Bose S. Laboratory Investigations on SMA mixes with Different Additives. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 2007; 8(1): 11-18.

Mogawer WS, Stuart KD. Effect of Mineral Fillers on Properties of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures. TRR 1530,National Research Council, TRB, USA. 1996; 86-94.

Muniandy R, Huat B. Laboratory Diameteral Fatigue Performance of Stone Matrix Asphalt with Cellulose Oil Palm Fibre. American Journal of Applied Sciences 2006; 3(9).

Punith VS, Sridhar R, Bose S et al. Comparative Studies on the Behaviour of Stone Matrix Asphalt and Asphaltic Concrete Mixtures utilizing Reclaimed Polyethylene. Highway Research Bulletin, No 71, IRC, New Delhi. 2004; 61-76.

Reddy KS, Palit SK, Pandey BB. Laboratory Evaluation of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt Mixes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2004; 45-53.

Suchismita A. A Study of Effects of Binder Quality and Natural Fiber on the Properties of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures. M. Tech Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2009.

Xue Y, Hou H, Shujing Z et al. Utilization of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash in Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixture: Pavement Performance and Environmental

Impact. Construction and Building Materials 2009; 23(2): 989-996.

Published

2020-12-13