Third-Party External Peer Review of a Journal: A New Method to Judge and Improve the Quality of a New Journal

Peer review

Authors

  • Wasana Kaewla Surin Rajabhat University, Surin Thailand
  • Viroj Wiwanitkit

Keywords:

Peer, Review

Abstract

There are many journals in biomedical society. Some journals are published locally and the quality control of these journals is very important. To select the best articles to include in the journal is the clue for improving the journal’s quality 1. As noted in the recent publication by Garg et al., “It can be concluded that manuscript rejection can be avoided by the authors, if the topic is well chosen and communication is maintained with the journal editorial”1. Indeed, to select a qualified journal into the library and database is the basic concept for any practitioner. Any articles that pass the first step of editorial screening and second step of peer reviewing will finally be published in the journal. It is the role of any new journal to upgrade and improve their publication to reach international standards.

References

1. Garg A, Das S, Jain H. Why we say no! A look through the editor’s eye. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(10): JB01-5. 2. Parrish DM, Bruns DE. US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process. JAMA 2002; 287(21): 2839-41.
3. Butler GJ, Forghani R. The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10(5): 349-53.

Published

2018-10-03